Keywords
political satire
political cartoons
armed conflict
Russian-Ukrainian war
How to Cite
Abstract
This article examines the use of impartial humour in political cartoons on the Russian-Ukrainian war. The dataset includes 18 political cartoons from Australia, the USA, Algeria, Morocco, Argentina, Brazil, Italy, Greece, Taiwan, Qatar, Iran, Ukraine, and Russia. This dataset is a selection from a corpus of 3,780 political cartoons from 65 countries in Europe, Asia, North America, South America, Africa, and Australia as a part of the research project “Laughter During the War: Russian Aggression in Ukraine in Political Cartoons and Memes”. The analysis of impartial humour is based on the corresponding parameters of political cartoons (goal-target, frame of reference-focus, and means-presentation) supplemented by two criteria: a) the author’s attitude toward the conflict parties and b) the author’s position towards the war and its consequences in general. Methodologically, it is supported by quantitative content analysis (MAXQDA 2024). It highlights the unique characteristics of this humour and its significance within the study of political cartoons. The authors conclude that even if political cartoonists do not show a clear stance on conflict parties, their work still reflects the vision of war as a global evil without borders. The paper presents insights into political cartoons as an important element of modern culture, providing a space for dialogue and discourse.
References
Baumgartner, J. C. (2021). Political humour. In M. Strick & T. E. Ford (Eds.), The social psychology of humour (pp. 20–38). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003042440-2-3
Benoit, W. L. (2007). Communication in political campaigns. Peter Lang.
The Biographical Dictionary of America. (2024). In Browne, Charles Farrar, The Biographical Dictionary of America, Volume 2. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Biographical_Dictionary_of_America/Browne,_Charles_Farrar
Carli, R. (2023). Is this “fascist” laughter? Notes on the ethics of humour. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 61, 427-438. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjp.1250
Coronel, J.C., O’Donnell, M.B., Pandey, P., Delli Carpini, M. X., & Falk, E.B. (2021). Political humor, sharing, and remembering: Insights from neuroimaging. Journal of Communication, 71(1), 129–161. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa041
Fatke, M. (2019). The personality of populists: How the Big Five traits relate to populist attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.018
Feldman, O. (2024). Humour and politics in the media: A conceptual introduction. In O. Feldman (Ed.), Communicating political humour in the media. The language of politics (pp.1-18). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0726-3_1
Furnham, A., & Fenton-O' Creevy, M. (2018). Personality and political orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 129, 88–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.020
Holbert, L.R., Hmielowski, J., Jain, P., Lather, J. & Morey, A. (2011). Adding nuance to the study of political humour effects: Experimental research on Juvenalian satire versus Horatian satire. American Behavioral Scientist, 55, 187-211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764210392156
Jiang, T., Li, H., & Hou, Y. (2019). Cultural differences in humour perception, usage, and implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article No. 123. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00123
Kfrerer, M., Bell, E., & Schermer, J.A. (2021). The politics of being funny: Humour styles, trait humorousness, and political orientations. Personality and Individual Differences, 182, 111073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111073
Knieper, T. (2002). Die politische Karikatur. Eine journalistische Darstellungsform und deren Produzenten. Herbert von Halem Verlag.
Knight, J. (2020, June 22). Bill Nye: humour writer is beloved nationally Laramie and a mule named “Boomerang”—his road to fame. Albany County Historical Society. Retrieved from https://www.wyoachs.com/people/2020/6/22/bill-nye-humor-writer-is-beloved-nationally-laramie-and-a-mule-named-boomeranghis-road-to-fame
Leon, L. (2024). In memes we trust? Co-option of democratisation of graphic political satire. In B. Nickl & M. Rolfe (Eds.), Moral dimensions of humour: Essays on humans, heroes and monsters (pp.105-136). Tampere University Press. https://doi.org/10.61201/tup.896
Mackay, J. (2016). What does society owe political cartoonists? Journalism Studies, 18 (1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2016.1218297.
Menéndez-Aller, Á., Postigo, Á., Montes-Álvarez, P., González-Primo, F.J, & García-Cueto, E. (2020). Humour as a protective factor against anxiety and depression. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 20(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2019.12.002
Paletz, D. L. (1990). Political humour and authority: From support to subversion. International Political Science Review, 11(4), 483-493. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251219001100406
Phiddian, R., & Haydon M. (2008). The editor and the cartoonist. In R. Phiddian & M. Haydon (Eds.), Comic commentators: Contemporary political cartooning in Australia (pp. 49–54). Network Books.
Roe, A. (2004). Graphic satire and public life in the age of terror. Media International Australia, 113(1), 55-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X0411300108
Tavory, I. (2014). The situations of culture: Humour and the limits of measurability. Theory and Society, 43, 275-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-014-9222-7.
Verhulst, B., & Hatemi, P. (2016). Correcting honest errors versus incorrectly portraying them: Responding to Ludeke and Rasmussen. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 361-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.046
Young, D. G. (2017). Theories and effects of political humor: Discounting cues, gateways, and the impact of incongruities. In K. Kenski & K. Jamieson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication. Oxford Academic. Retrieved November 12, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.29_update_001
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 The European Journal of Humour Research