Keywords
Poland
Belarus
conservative
liberal
targets
How to Cite
Abstract
The migrant crisis on the Polish-Belarusian and Lithuanian-Belarusian borders has resulted in border crossing restrictions and the construction of walls separating Poland and Lithuania from Belarus. It has also provoked humorous reactions in online media. We discuss the targets of these humorous reactions and illustrate how humour highlights the gap between Belarusian and Polish authorities’ activities/claims and reality. We analyse conservative (pro-government) and liberal (anti-government) humour from both sides, and reflect on the similarities and differences across countries and political stances. We argue that Belarusian humour contextualises the migrant crisis within the broader Belarusian political crisis rather than within the international political landscape, though international references are not uncommon in Belarusian conservative humour. In Polish humour, however, what prevails are meme topics on Polish politics or people and institutions. The migrants themselves become targets more frequently in Polish jokes and memes than in Belarusian ones, although only in conservative humour. The analysis illustrates how different political forces use humour to promote their own agenda. It also paves the way for future studies of liberal and conservative humour, as the adoption of either of the two types of humour is dependent on individual psychological factors and political stances. It is also subject to changes in the political situation as has been the case in Poland.
References
Attardo, S. (2023). Humor 2.0 — How the Internet changed humour. Anthem Press.
Attardo, S., & Raskin, V. (1991). Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model. Humor. International Journal of Humor Research, 4(3-4), 293-348. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1991.4.3-4.293.
Auseyushkin, Y. (2021, January). Telegram is more than a Messenger in Belarus. Visegrad / Insight. Retrieved September 14, 2024, from: https://visegradinsight.eu/telegram-is-more-than-a-messenger-in-belarus/.
Baruchello, G. & Arnarsson, A.M. (2021) Sophistication and superiority: An appraisal of ‘true humour. Appraisal 12(3-4). 1-13. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357702385_SOPHISTICATION_AND_SUPERIORITY_AN_APPRAISAL_OF_'TRUE_HUMOUR'_article.
Baziur, G. (2022). Operation “Sluice”. The so-called migration crisis at the Polish-Belarussian border: an example of hybrid actions taken in the second half of 2021 as documented in the reports of the Polish border guard. Bezpieczeństwo. Teoria i Praktyka, 46(1), 133-150.
Becker, A. B. (2012). Comedy types and political campaigns: The differential influence of other-directed hostile humour and self-ridicule on candidate evaluations. Mass Communication and Society, 15(6), 791-812. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2011.628431.
Becker, A. B. (2014). Playing with politics: Online political parody, affinity for political humour, anxiety reduction, and implications for political efficacy. Mass Communication & Society, 17(3), 424–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2014.891134.
Bestvater, S. E., & Monroe, B. L. (2023). Sentiment is not stance: Target-aware opinion classification for political text analysis. Political Analysis, 31(2), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2022.10
Brzozowska, D., & Chłopicki, W. (2024). Cultural wars in Polish political humor. In O. Feldman (Ed.), Political humour worldwide: The cultural context of political comedy, satire, and parody (pp. 117-138). Springer Nature Singapore.
Carlson, B., & Frazer, R. (2021). Fun. In B. Carlson & R. Frazer (Eds.), Indigenous digital life: The practice and politics of being indigenous on social media (pp. 121-139). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84796-8_6.
Chiaro, D. (2018). The language of jokes in the digital age. Routledge.
Chłopicki, W. (2023). The drama of dialogue action in distinct discourse spaces: Conservative and liberal humour in television talk shows. Language and Dialogue, 13(3), 383-406. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00156.chl.
Davies, C. (2011). Jokes and targets. Indiana University Press.
Elo, S. & Helvi, K. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
Fiadotava, A., Astapova, A., Hendershott, R., McKinnon, M., & Jürgens, A. S. (2023). Injecting fun? Humour, conspiracy theory and (anti) vaccination discourse in popular media. Public Understanding of Science, 32(5), 622-640. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221147019.
Fiadotava, A., Zakharkevich, S. (2025). I signed the house over to a cat: Humor of Belarusian 2020-2021 protests. FOLKLORICA - Journal of the Slavic East European and Eurasian Folklore Association, 29, 52−75. https://doi.org/10.17161/folklorica.v29i.24685
Flores-Borjabad, S. A. (2018). Political cartoons in the Middle East: a new form of communication and resistance. US-China Foreign Language, 16(6), 320-329. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327421501_Political_Cartoons_in_the_Middle_East_A_New_Form_of_Communication_and_Resistance.
Herkman, J. (2019). Populism in political cartoons: Caricatures of Nordic populist leaders. Popular Communication: The International Journal of Media and Culture, 17(3), 252–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2019.1614183.
Hietalahti, J. (2024). Humanistic ethics of humour: The problematics of punching up and kicking down. The philosophy of humour yearbook, 5(1), 91-119. https://doi.org/10.1515/phhumyb-2024-0005.
Kuipers, G. (2002). Media culture and Internet disaster jokes: Bin Laden and the attack on the World Trade Centre. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 5(4), 450-470.
Kuipers, G. (2011). The politics of humour in the public sphere: Cartoons, power and modernity in the first transnational humour scandal. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 14(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549410370072.
Laineste, L., & Fiadotava, A. (2024). Polarised but similar: Russian and Belarusian pro-and anti-democratic humour in the public sphere. The European Journal of Humour Research, 12(1), 194-215. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR.2024.12.1.835.
Laineste, L. & Shilikhina, K. (2024). Social media as a venue for generating and using humour. In T. Ford, W. Chłopicki & G. Kuipers (Eds.), De Gruyter handbook of humor studies. (pp. 348-362). De Gruyter.
Lewis, P. (2006). Cracking up: American humour in a time of conflict. University of Chicago Press.
Lukianova, N., Shteynman, M. & Fell, E. (2019). Political memes in the 2018 presidential campaigns in Russia: dialogue and conflict. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 10 (1), 71-86. https://doi.org/10.1386/ejpc.10.1.71_1.
Nieuwenhuis, I. & Zijp, D. (2022). The politics and aesthetics of humour in an age of comic controversy. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 25(2), 341–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494221084118.
Nissenbaum, A. & Shifman, L. (2017). Internet memes as contested cultural capital: The case of 4chan’s/b/board. New Media & Society, 19(4), 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815609313.
Oring, E. (2004). Risky business: Political jokes under repressive regimes. Western Folklore, 63(3), 209-236.
Phiddian, R. (2020). Satire and the Public Emotions. Cambridge University Press.
Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16(1), 101-127. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242.
Shrodes, A. (2021). Humor as political possibility: Critical media literacy in LGBTQ+ participatory cultures. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(4), 855-876. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.328.
Sienkiewicz, M., & Marx, N. (2022). That’s not funny: How the right makes comedy work for them. University of California Press.
Wagner, A. & Schwarzenegger, C. (2020). A populism of lulz: the proliferation of humour, satire, and memes as populist communication in digital culture, In Krämer B. & Holtz-Bacha, C. (eds.), Perspectives on populism and the media. Avenues for research. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft GmbH & Co. KG, pp. 313-332.
Wiggins, B. (2019). The discursive power of memes in digital culture. Routledge.
Yehorova, O., Prokopenko, A., & Zinchenko, A. (2023). Towards a typology of humorous wartime tweets: the case of Ukraine 2022. The European Journal of Humour Research, 11(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR.2023.11.1.746.
Young, D. G. (2019). Irony and outrage: The polarized landscape of rage, fear, and laughter in the United States. Oxford University Press.
Young, D. G., Bagozzi, B. E., Goldring, A., Poulsen, S., & Drouin, E. (2019). Psychology, political ideology, and humour appreciation: Why is satire so liberal?. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(2), 134-147. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000157.
Yurchak, A. (1997). The cynical reason of late socialism: Power, pretence, and the anekdot. Public Culture, 9 (2), 161–188. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-9-2-161.
Zelizer, C. (2010). Laughing our way to peace or war: Humour and peacebuilding. Journal of Conflictology 1(2), 1-9.
Zeller, J. P., & Sitchinava, D. (2019). The Russian language in Belarus and Ukraine. In A. Mustajoki, E. Protassova & M. Yelenevskaya (Eds.), The soft power of the Russian language (pp. 108-122). Routledge.
Internet references
Green Border (2024, September), In Wikipedia. Retrieved from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Border#:~:text=Green%20Border%20(Polish:%20Zielona%20granica)%20is%20a%202023%20drama%20film.
TVN24 (2021). "Nie mówimy tu o żadnych ruchach uchodźczych". Ministrowie pokazali slajdy. Retrieved from: https://tvn24.pl/polska/sytuacja-na-granicy-polsko-bialoruskiej-szefowie-mon-mswia-i-sg-o-migrantach-i-zachowaniu-funkcjonariuszy-bialoruskich-st5429730.
TVN24 (2023). Kontrowersyjna konferencja ministrów Kamińskiego i Błaszczaka. "GW": sąd nakazał prokuraturze śledztwo. Retrieved from: https://tvn24.pl/polska/konferencja-ministrow-kaminskiego-i-blaszczaka-kontrowersje-wokol-prezentowanych-zdjec-sad-chce-sledztwa-uzasadnienie-st6644163.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 The European Journal of Humour Research