Slaughtering, skinning, stripping: cannibal humour in Heiner Müller’s work
VIEW FULL TEXT

Keywords

German theatre
postdramatic theatre
grotesque

How to Cite

Dupont, B., & Jousten, L. (2025). Slaughtering, skinning, stripping: cannibal humour in Heiner Müller’s work. The European Journal of Humour Research, 13(1), 104-115. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR.2025.13.1.988

Abstract

GDR playwright Heiner Müller (1929-1995) is famous for the dark, carnivalesque humour of his plays, mostly dealing with German historical traumas. To approach the complexity of Müllerian theatrical texts, this article focuses on a salient form of their grotesque horror: cannibalism. In Germania Death in Berlin (1971) and its structurally and thematically similar sequel Germania 3 Ghosts at the Dead Man (1995), references to cannibalism are omnipresent. They occur in three variations: slaughtering, skinning, and stripping. The first echoes the centrality of the military battle in Müller’s work. Relying on the polysemy of the German word stem schlacht (meaning both “battle” and “slaughtering of animals”), it unveils the reoccurrence of blood and violence in German history and culture, behind the mask of political antagonism. Skinning, the second form of cannibalism, also builds on wordplay: Müller depicts the Stalingrad Kesselschlacht (“battle of encirclement”, literally “battle in a cauldron”) as a long process of soldiers dismembering and devouring each other. While slaughtering and skinning both gradually transform specific individuals into the collective, organic form of meat, the third cannibalistic variation, stripping, refers to another kind of opposition between bodies, represented satirically as well: sexuality. The progressive undressing also reveals the flesh and sheds light onto the carnal drive in human behaviour. As stripping is linked with depraved sexual acts, i.e. rape and necrophilia, this underlines its proximity with slaughtering and skinning. In sum, the Germania diptych deconstructs ideologies through reducing them to their corporeal essence, in a mix of horror and laughter.    

VIEW FULL TEXT

References

Bakhtin, M. (1970). L’œuvre de François Rabelais et la culture populaire au Moyen Âge et sous la Renaissance. Gallimard.

Combes, A. (2009). Pour une pratique dramaturgique de l’après-coup: remarques sur quelques inserts du Germania 3 de Heiner Müller. Cahiers d'Études Germaniques, 57(2), 255-278.

Dupont, B. (2012). “Die Macht ist ja hier eine öffentliche Ohnmacht”. Performativität und Paradox: Das Ich-Werk als Fanal. Eine intermediale Studie von Heiner Müllers Autobiographie “Krieg ohne Schlacht: Leben in zwei Diktaturen” und seiner Gespräche. [Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of Liège]

Greiner, B. (1986). “Jetzt will ich sitzen wo gelacht wird”: Über das Lachen bei Heiner Müller. In P.G. Klussman, & G. Mohr (Eds.), Dialektik des Anfangs. Spiele des Lachens. Literaturpolitik in Bibliotheken. Über Texte von Heiner Müller, Franz Fühmann, Stefan Heym (pp. 29-63). Herbert Grundmann.

Hennefeld, M. & Sammond, N. (2020). Not It, or, The Abject Objection. In M. Hennefeld & N. Sammond (Eds.), Abjection incorporated. Mediating the politics of pleasure & violence (pp. 1-31). Duke University Press.

Hodgin, N. (2014). Cannibals, carnival and clowns: the grotesque in German unification films, Studies in Eastern European Cinema, 5(2), 124-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/17411548.2014.925333

Kalb, J. (2006). Germania 3: Gespenster am toten Mann: Heiner Müller and the Art of Posthumous Provocation. New German Critique, 98, 49-64.

Keller, A. (1994). Drama und Dramaturgie Heiner Müllers zwischen 1956 und 1988. 2nd edition. Peter Lang.

Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of horror. An essay on abjection. (L. Roudez, Trans.) Columbia University Press.

Kluge, A., & Müller, H. (1995). Demokratie als Allesfresser: Heiner Müller über den Satz “Einverständnis dehnt sich aus”. [video interview]. https://kluge.library.cornell.edu/de/conversations/mueller/film/1868/

Kluge, A. (2000). Chronik der Gefühle. Band 1: Basisgeschichten. Suhrkamp.

Laineste, L., & Krikmann, A. (2015). “The favourite food of an Estonian is another Estonian”: A paremiological insight into national communication style. In D. Brzozowska & W. Chłopicki (Eds.), Culture’s Software: Communication Styles. (pp. 89-108). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Lehmann, H.-T. (1999). Postdramatisches Theater. Verlag der Autoren.

Löschner, S. (2002). Geschichte als persönliches Drama: Heiner Müller im Spiegel seiner Interviews und Gespräche. Peter Lang.

Meuser, M. (2019). Schwarzer Karneval - Heiner Müllers Poetik des Grotesken. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110616552

Morel, J.-P. (2013). Brecht et Müller. Les métamorphoses du Dieu bonheur. Études germaniques, 272(4), 719-723. https://doi.org/10.3917/eger.272.0719

Morel, J.-P. (2022). Alexander Kluge et Heiner Müller : les Entretiens – et par-delà. In É. Lyøe & V. Pauval, (Eds)., Alexander Kluge et la France. Éléments de poétique transculturelle. (pp. 235-254). Presses Universitaires Blaise-Pascal. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pubp.7406

Müller, H. (1990). Ein Brief. In F. Hörnigk (Ed.), Heiner Müller Material. Texte und Kommentare (pp. 37-39). Reclam.

Müller, H. (1995). Germania 3 Gespenster am toten Mann. Kiepenheuer & Witsch.

Müller, H. (2002). Germania Death in Berlin. (D. Redmond, Transl.) [online]. Accessed via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20081122014136/http://www.efn.org/~dredmond/Germania.PDF

Müller, H. (2001). Germania Tod in Berlin. In F. Hörnigk (Ed.), Werke 4: Die Stücke (pp. 325-377). Suhrkamp.

Müller, H. (2001). Germania 3 Ghosts at the Dead Man. In Weber, C. (Ed.), A Heiner Müller reader: Plays, poetry, prose. (C. Weber. Transl.). John Hopkins University Press.

Müller, H. (2005). Krieg ohne Schlacht. Leben in zwei Diktaturen: Eine Autobiographie. (= Werke 9, Hörnigk, F, ed.). Suhrkamp.

Silbermann, M. (2003). Bertolt Brecht. In H.-T. Lehman & P. Primavesi (Eds.), Heiner Müller Handbuch. Leben – Werk – Wirkung (pp. 136-146). Metzler.

Schulte, C. (2004). Wahrnehmungen am Nullpunkt der Sprache. Notizen zu Heiner Müller und Alexander Kluge. In C. Schulte & B.M. Maier (Eds.), Der Text ist der Coyote: Heiner Müller. Bestandsaufnahme (pp. 189-196). Suhrkamp.

Thorson, J.A. (1985). A funny thing happened on the way to the morgue: Some thoughts on humor and death, and a taxonomy of the humor associated with death. Death Studies, 9, 201–216.

Varney, D. (2003). Heiner Müller’s Germania 3 Ghosts at Dead Man: Atrocity and Pain in German History and Theatre. Double Dialogues, 4. Retrieved from https://doubledialogues.com/article/heiner-mullers-germania-3-ghosts-at-dead-man-atrocity-and-pain-in-german-history-and-theatre/.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 The European Journal of Humour Research

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.